In Kierkegaard’s existentialist interpretation, Abraham has reservations about sacrificing his son, but overcomes them. In a more traditionalist framework, he’s a total devotee with no shred of doubt. The former knows it’s irrational to engage in human sacrifice, but chooses to be irrational, anyways. The latter believes it’s perfectly rational.
I think the fear of God, is like the fear himself, so Abraham concerns is own fear, like God's one. God killed so many people, may be be fear of become an abomination like the Devil. Abraham for me in the Genesis represents the image of God. Like we now in the second path try to be like Christ, the God without fear of evil, so the redeemer.
I think the fear of God, is like the fear himself, so Abraham concerns is own fear, like God's one. God killed so many people, may be be fear of become an abomination like the Devil. Abraham for me in the Genesis represents the image of God. Like we now in the second path try to be like Christ, the God without fear of evil, so the redeemer.