“I no longer see a difference between the bee and the architect.”—Michael Serres
Michel Serres says that “work is the struggle against noise.” (In French, the word is parasite.)
To work is to remove the static that obscures the message; the interruptions that detract from the meal. To work is to sort the useful out from the useless.
In Serres’s expansive definition, work is indistinguishable from life itself. There is nothing that is not work.
Locke’s definition is a bit more straightforward—to mix oneself up with what is given (nature) such that one adds value to it and transforms it. Work is the process by which I come to own my materials.
Jewish law defines work (malacha) in opposition to rest (shabbat). Most forms of work involve changing the substance of the underlying thing (i.e., turning dough into bread). But the first category of work discussed in the Talmud is carrying—which just means changing a thing’s context. It is likewise considered work to travel a great distance on Shabbat (the implication being that doing so is a kind of self-work.)
The scientific definition of work focuses less on output than input: work is energy spent or consumed.
Philosophical definitions of work seem far from the everyday (and economic) experience of it, where work is thought of in terms of employment, wages, work hours. In the more colloquial sense, work is only what one is paid for.
A philosophical sense of work is evident in phrases like “handwork,” “artwork,” and “life-work.”
What is work to you—and how do you relate the everyday sense of work to the existential sense of work as change or transformation?
What is Called Thinking? is a practice of asking a daily question on the belief that self-reflection brings awe, joy, and enrichment to one’s life. Consider becoming a subscriber to support this project and access subscriber-only content.
You can read my weekly Torah commentary here.
This reminds me of a quote from the founder of a commune that I heard on a podcast that is one of my favorite things I've ever heard.
He was talking about how many potential immigrants to the commune wanted to move there in order to live in a better place but that it didn't really work that way. They needed people who understood that it wasn't a completed project ready for them to move into and just live a new life. They needed people who *wanted* to work continuously on it with no hope of it ever being "done."
Then he spoke more broadly about contemporary human society and said the thing I loved: "We need to fall in love with maintenance."
Falling in love with maintenance is my highest aspiration. Maintenance of my relationships, maintenance of my car.... and everything in between. Doesn't come naturally... otherwise we would already be in love with maintenance and the first step of falling in love wouldn't be so critical.
Great reframing, love this. I remember sitting in a class with Michel serres on la Fontaine and he described human technological history as a transition form an exoskeleton to an endoskeleton to the creation of new exoskeletons. So creative.
I’m torn between work as being, and work as transformation, but often I’m unfortunately stuck in labor